SOVR N1 vs. LoRa / Meshtastic
SOVR N1 is designed for usable local IP networking. LoRa / Meshtastic is designed for ultra-low-power, long-range messaging. They solve different problems.
| Capability | SOVR N1 (Wi-Fi HaLow Mesh) | LoRa / Meshtastic |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Local private network for teams & properties | Ultra-low-power long-range messaging |
| Network type | IP-based local mesh network | Low-bitrate radio message mesh |
| Typical data rates | Megabit-class at local ranges* | Kilobit-level or lower |
| Voice communication | ✓ Supported (range-dependent) | ✕ Not practical at scale |
| Maps & ATAK data | ✓ Supported locally | ✕ Not practical (bandwidth-limited) |
| Messaging | ✓ Real-time | ✓ Text-only |
| Media / sensor data | ✓ Limited, local ranges | ✕ Not feasible |
| Latency | Low (interactive use) | High (store-and-forward) |
| Mesh behavior | Automatic, adaptive routing | Hop-based message relays |
| Typical runtime | ~6+ hours active use | Days to weeks (duty-cycled) |
| Accounts / SIM / cloud | None required | None required |
| TAK compatibility | ✓ Native local integration | ◐ Limited / indirect |
| Best use case | Properties, teams, training, coordination | Long-range signaling & beacons |
Many users run both systems together — LoRa for long-range signaling, SOVR N1 for local coordination and data.
Runtime reflects fundamentally different operating models: continuous local networking vs intermittent low-power signaling. *Throughput and application performance vary based on distance, terrain, interference, network topology, firmware, and regulatory limits. Information shown reflects prototype testing and typical system behavior, not guarantees.